Change Scenario
Olusanya Oyeyemi
Walden University
MMSL 6661
Dr. Evan
Duff
16 December 2015
Abstract
For any
organization to measure up to the millennium standard, it must implement
frequent development changes which must be discovered by someone and
implemented after unanimous agreement by leaders. This paper shows the change I
have nursed in my organization for years and its pros and cons for both the
organization and the employees.
Also, I
enumerate conflict resolution that may emerge in the process of making a
change, courses, identifications and resolution.
I have
served four years plus in the military and within those years my observation
for significant change was that graduate employees both as enlisted and
officers were not employed into a relevant discipline to their degree. It is
very common to see a historian or an economist heading engineering division
where technical skill is necessary. Even though the officers’ duty might be
more of management, what about the enlisted that do the real job and have
college degree in a certain discipline that might be of assistance and
consistency in their career. Military spent a lot of dollar and time in
training and retrain their personnel, which can be reduced when people are
trained in line with their previous degree.
As a
leader, to coordinates a successful deliberation towards making a change in
military, I will employ both structured and unstructured approaches to
encourage free and open deliberations. I will make sure we end up in
reconciling our differences and find a common ground before the final decision
is taken. My main job as an effective change leader in the
deliberation is to moderate and mediate the deliberation. I will provide a
clear direction of how the deliberation will take to prepare the mind of the
members that their contributions are valuable and count.
Finding
job satisfaction is very important if we want to retain personnel. Petty et al
inferred that “individual job satisfaction and job performance are positively
correlated” (1984). Likewise, when employee realise that their behaviours will
be rewarded they will monitor their performance to be on the positive side. To lead
changes in Navy would require a long process and many procedures because it is
big organization. Each phases of the change process will have it significant,
before launching the deliberation my prelaunch phase I would reflect on my
proposed change of making sure all college graduate that will be employed are
commission into officer’s program and aligning their discipline with their duty
to enhance their performance and commitment to the job.
Data of
both enlisted and officers that retain their job after ten years will be
collected to design my persuasion plan, and I will make sure we maintain a
positive emotion by focusing on the objective so that we can handle conflict
maturely. We can do much more with our team by encouraging harmonious
deliberation by resolving conflict within our working group but not changing
the objective.
One
concept that I feel will help me be a better leader in the future features is the
ability to observe nonverbal signs of members. For as many that may have very
important ideas but afraid of saying it for a reason best known to them, such
knowledge may be discovered by reading their nonverbal reactions and find the
solution to the problem. I find this concept most interesting as well because I
do not know it has a place in the business world. In fact, I am implementing
this concept right away into my daily lifestyle to shape my decision to be an
effective leader.
In
addition, now I realize that every giggle, actions, and ideas are relevant in
change and conflict management. Moreover, I learned that making a change is not
an easy task that one can just jump into without full preparation. The way I
will now approach both change and conflict management differently is by fully
preparing myself for the challenge first, secondly weigh my facts and figure to
justify the means before the presentation.
Reference
Petty
M.M., McGee. G.W., and Cavender, J.W. (1984) A Meta – Analysis of the
Relationship
Between Individual Job Satisfaction
and Individual Performance. Academic of
Management Review, University of Alabama. Vol. 9, No. 4,
712-721
Roberto,
M. (2009). Why great leaders don't take yes for an answer: Managing for
conflict and consensus. Upper Saddle River, NJ:
Wharton School Publishing.
No comments:
Post a Comment